Alpha Galactica logo Alpha Galactica Technology Investment Insights

Claim under review / Power & capacity

Power constraints are slowing data-centre expansion

Electricity supply and grid access may be becoming the binding constraints on new computing capacity.

AMZN MSFT GOOGL VRT ETN GEV BE PWR CEG VST TLN

Current assessment

New evidence

FERC’s decision complicates grid management for data-centre expansion. By striking down PJM's proposal to curtail large loads lacking matching generation, federal regulators prevented discriminatory restrictions from being imposed on facilities. However, rejecting the framework leaves regional connection procedures unresolved. This prolongs regulatory uncertainty across the largest US power market as utilities and developers seek compliant ways to connect massive loads. While operators avoid immediate curtailment mandates, the lack of an approved interconnection process leaves connection queues and grid bottlenecks in place.

Latest development: On October 12, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected most of PJM Interconnection’s plan to curtail large loads lacking matching new generation, ruling that the proposed restrictions intruded on state jurisdiction and appeared discriminatory.

Last material update
13 Oct 2026
Last checked
13 Oct 2026

Development history

8 updates

  1. On October 12, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected most of PJM Interconnection’s plan to curtail large loads lacking matching new generation, ruling that the proposed restrictions intruded on state jurisdiction and appeared discriminatory.

    FERC’s decision complicates grid management for data-centre expansion. By striking down PJM's proposal to curtail large loads lacking matching generation, federal regulators prevented discriminatory restrictions from being imposed on facilities. However, rejecting the framework leaves regional connection procedures unresolved. This prolongs regulatory uncertainty across the largest US power market as utilities and developers seek compliant ways to connect massive loads. While operators avoid immediate curtailment mandates, the lack of an approved interconnection process leaves connection queues and grid bottlenecks in place.

    • Challenges the claimUtility Dive
      FERC rejects most of PJM’s large load interconnection plan
      The PJM Interconnection’s plan for curtailing large loads that don’t have matching new generation intrudes on state jurisdiction and appears to be discriminatory, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said.

  2. Federal regulators intervened in PJM's backstop power auction, causing delays after the grid operator fell short of reserve margins specifically due to aggressive data center load growth.

    The strain of rapid data center expansion on regional power grids is increasingly triggering regulatory friction. PJM, the largest US grid operator, has been forced to delay its backstop power auction after federal regulators intervened over cost allocation concerns. This delay, stemming directly from PJM falling short of reserve margins due to aggressive data center load growth, underscores how grid constraints and regulatory hurdles are complicating capacity planning.

  3. State governments are increasingly slowing data center development in response to public backlash, while community groups are demanding direct financial compensation from hyperscalers like Microsoft.

    Local opposition and state-level interventions continue to impede data center expansion. States are actively slowing development as public sentiment sours, while environmental groups are raising alarms over the health risks of on-site backup generators. Furthermore, community groups are beginning to demand direct financial compensation from hyperscalers like Microsoft, adding new friction and costs to capacity buildouts.

  4. Alternative power strategies and grid connections are faltering, evidenced by Crusoe abandoning a $1.25 billion turbine plan and a 750-MW Oklo project facing an 18-month delay due to a rejected FERC interconnection complaint.

    Power constraints and interconnection hurdles are actively disrupting data center capacity plans. Crusoe has abandoned a $1.25 billion initiative to deploy stationary turbines at AI data centers, highlighting the difficulty of executing alternative off-grid power strategies. Concurrently, a 750-MW Oklo power project in Virginia faces a minimum 18-month delay after federal regulators rejected its plea to be reinstated into the regional grid's interconnection study cycle.

  5. Oracle issued force majeure notices for multiple data center projects (Project Jupiter and New Mexico Stargate) due to potential energization delays, while New Jersey regulators fined a data center for relying on unpermitted gas generators.

    Power constraints are causing tangible delays and contractual disputes for hyperscalers, as evidenced by Oracle issuing force majeure notices over potential delays to its 2028 data center projects. Additionally, the reliance on temporary power solutions is facing regulatory backlash, with New Jersey fining a data center over a million dollars for using dozens of gas generators, highlighting the friction between rapid capacity expansion and local environmental enforcement.

  6. Local opposition to data centers is escalating into a broader political and regulatory issue, with new large-load tariffs emerging nationally and data center power concerns becoming a central theme in Texas state elections.

    Power constraints and local opposition are increasingly translating into broad regulatory and political friction across the US. Efforts to curb speculative data center projects are gaining ground through large-load tariffs and shifting state-level policies. Furthermore, data center opposition is becoming a prominent political issue, notably reshaping Texas election races as voters cite concerns over power and utility costs.

  7. Regulatory pushback is actively blocking new power generation, as North Carolina regulators denied Duke Energy's gas turbine request due to insufficient proof of data center demand.

    Power constraints are increasingly manifesting as regulatory friction and direct hyperscaler investments in generation. While California previously shifted grid upgrade costs to data centers, new regulatory hurdles are emerging elsewhere. North Carolina regulators denied a utility's request for a new gas turbine, explicitly citing a failure to justify the facility's necessity for data centers. This highlights how regulatory scrutiny over infrastructure costs is actively blocking new power capacity intended for compute expansion, compounded by ongoing local opposition in states like Pennsylvania.

  8. State-level regulatory interventions are intensifying, with Texas halting permits and California shifting grid upgrade costs to data centers. In response, hyperscalers are bypassing traditional grid reliance by directly funding nuclear generation.

    Power constraints are increasingly manifesting as regulatory friction and direct hyperscaler investments in generation. Texas has halted data center permits, while California is mandating that data centers pay for grid upgrades. Conversely, Texas regulators softened interconnection rules, and Google is directly funding a 50-megawatt nuclear plant, illustrating both the regulatory hurdles and the extreme measures taken to secure capacity.