About Alpha Galactica

One brief every morning on the biggest mover in NASDAQ technology, plus a live read of market signals.

Alpha Galactica is an independent project run by me, Zac Walker. I have worked in technology for three decades and have a successful track record of investing in technology stocks. I have worked at several large investment banks, which gave me a view of the financial industry from the inside, and I now work in big tech, which gives me an insider's perspective.

What you get

• The daily brief. Published each morning: what moved across the tape, a deep dive on the day's single biggest technology mover, and a short list of concrete things to watch next.
• Market signals. A continuously refreshed dashboard of sentiment, structural stress and cycle positioning, with a plain-English read of what the two headline gauges are saying.
• Coverage history. Every stock we've featured, with every brief that mentioned it, so you can see what we said at the time rather than after the fact.

How the featured stock is chosen

Each morning we screen the NASDAQ technology universe and rank it by the size of the day's move. The screen only considers ordinary common shares with a meaningful traded value, so warrants, units, rights and thinly traded shells can't take the top slot on a headline percentage that no one could actually have traded. The largest qualifying mover becomes the day's deep dive.

How it's written

Methodology by humans, executed by AI. Briefs are produced by an AI engine following a human-designed methodology, using public market data and news sources. Every article says so on the page. The engine is given the same market data and signals described above; it does not have access to non-public information.

Limitations

The briefs are a starting point for your own work, not a substitute for it. They are informational only and are not investment advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and not tailored to your circumstances. Market data can be delayed or wrong, and AI-written analysis can be wrong too. Reaction counts on articles are real reader votes; nothing on this site is seeded or simulated.

For corrections, takedowns, or general enquiries, please use the contact form.